The pay-per-click method is easy and straightforward. Place an ad to show on Google or some other pay-per-click search engine.
Customers click on it. It brings them to a page where they can make the buy. Pay-per-click marketing is a quick, powerful, efficient way to marketplace products for affiliate programs. New advertisers towards the medium are often stunned at how quick and effective it's.
But sometimes these of us who use the pay-per-click market get into the same mindset and overlook perfectly lucrative goods simply simply because they don't spend out as much right away I'm talking about the power of residual income, and any time you find an affiliate plan that pays 'residually' or mentions the words 'lifetime customer', you should take notice.
Here's an example. Suppose you discover two web-service providers, each of which has an affiliate program. #1 provides an immediate payout of 60% per sale to you for anybody who buys their service. Sounds fairly good; it's a high payout and you believe you can get a good conversion rate on any ads you run for their services. #2, however, pays out only $10 per sale, but offers $10 per month residually for the lifetime of the consumer.
Oftentimes, those of us who play the pay-per-click game get so in the mindset of 'quick money' that we tend to dismiss these affiliate programs that have lower payouts with out really considering what may be offered. Which from the two internet services has the much better payout general? We know that web host #1 pays out 60% per sale. That's fast cash, a lot from the time it is easy to believe. But suppose a consumer buys internet services from business.
Presumably, if he is pleased using the service, he'll stay with it for a very long time, possibly the rest of his life. So although the initial payout is only $10, the possible return of this one sale is $10 per month, for the rest from the customer's life! I believe that kind of payout deserves a second look. So which service will be the better to promote? The answer, of course, is both of them.
Depending on how well each service converts to sales, and what the click-through rate is on your ads, either or both of the above services might be wrong for you to promote. But either or each might be extremely profitable. Don't dismiss low-paying payouts out of hand, particularly if there's residual revenue involved.
Customers click on it. It brings them to a page where they can make the buy. Pay-per-click marketing is a quick, powerful, efficient way to marketplace products for affiliate programs. New advertisers towards the medium are often stunned at how quick and effective it's.
But sometimes these of us who use the pay-per-click market get into the same mindset and overlook perfectly lucrative goods simply simply because they don't spend out as much right away I'm talking about the power of residual income, and any time you find an affiliate plan that pays 'residually' or mentions the words 'lifetime customer', you should take notice.
Here's an example. Suppose you discover two web-service providers, each of which has an affiliate program. #1 provides an immediate payout of 60% per sale to you for anybody who buys their service. Sounds fairly good; it's a high payout and you believe you can get a good conversion rate on any ads you run for their services. #2, however, pays out only $10 per sale, but offers $10 per month residually for the lifetime of the consumer.
Oftentimes, those of us who play the pay-per-click game get so in the mindset of 'quick money' that we tend to dismiss these affiliate programs that have lower payouts with out really considering what may be offered. Which from the two internet services has the much better payout general? We know that web host #1 pays out 60% per sale. That's fast cash, a lot from the time it is easy to believe. But suppose a consumer buys internet services from business.
Presumably, if he is pleased using the service, he'll stay with it for a very long time, possibly the rest of his life. So although the initial payout is only $10, the possible return of this one sale is $10 per month, for the rest from the customer's life! I believe that kind of payout deserves a second look. So which service will be the better to promote? The answer, of course, is both of them.
Depending on how well each service converts to sales, and what the click-through rate is on your ads, either or both of the above services might be wrong for you to promote. But either or each might be extremely profitable. Don't dismiss low-paying payouts out of hand, particularly if there's residual revenue involved.
0 comments:
Post a Comment